6 Pages

Dec 22, 2009

RIF'ed DC Teachers Challenge Union Colleagues To Fight

Teachers and school counselors who were recently laid off by the Rhee administration have stepped up their fight on behalf of unfairly laid off teacher colleagues. These group of laid off teachers and school staff are known as Fight for Fired DC personnel. Included in this activist group are Washington Teachers’ Union Executive Board members Sheila Gill, Willie Brewer and Agnes Dyson. This group plans to work to combat unfair November 2 teacher cuts by  Chancellor Rhee’s administration.

Fight For Fired DC Personnels’ first actions included advancing their written request to the Washington Teachers’ Union for financial assistance to the cover the cost of their legal appeals to OEA (Office of Employee Appeals). This request was sent to the WTU President George Parker as well as AFT President Randi Weingarten via certified mail.

At last week’s rescheduled December 15 executive board meeting, Sheila Gill, WTU Board member proposed a motion that the WTU will file a legal appeal of Judge Bartnoff’s November 24 ruling. It was noted that  there is a 30 day timeline to file an appeal. Although much discussion ensued, WTU President George Parker did not lend his support for a motion to appeal Bartnoff’s decision. He indicated that he did not vote since the motion did not result in a tie. Unfortunately, our union attorney was not present at the WTU Executive Board meeting.

 I spoke in favor of laid off teachers’ right to an appeal even though WTU President George Parker would not allow me to speak in the first round and only reluctantly allowed me to speak in the second round of discussions on this matter. I do not agree with the parliamentarian’s opinion (John Tatum)  that I should not be allowed to vote ex-officio as a member of the Board of Trustees (BOT) given that a decision was made for BOT members to be included in all executive board meetings. So it seems that Parker twists Robert's Rules of Order to his convenience denying me the opportunity to speak or requiring me to speak last in an effort to prevent my voice from being heard.

 Given that union president, George Parker historically is not a fighter, it is not surprising that he does not support teachers' legal right to file an appeal to Judge Bartnoff’s November 24 legal decision. However, what came as a surprise to me is that most elected teacher board members acknowledged that they had not even read Judge’s Bartnoff’s decision on the Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) and preliminary injunction which is not only posted on the WTU website but has also been written about and discussed in the mainstream media. Rather than take a stand to support their laid off colleagues right to a legal appeal, teachers on the executive board, some of whom acknowledged that they had previously been laid off- decided to either abstain from voting or cast their vote no.

It is troubling when teachers who are elected to represent teachers are uninformed about matters that impact our membership and vote to abstain from voting. Among those who abstained from voting included Robert Willis who by the way is a laid off teacher from Ballou Senior High and former WTU Building Representative. 

A roll call vote was held and here are the results:

Abstained from voting: Maria Angala (teacher/Jefferson MS), Joyce Armoo ( teacher/Seaton ES), Deborah Hines  (teacher/Beers ES) , Andre’ Taylor (itinerant librarian), Robert Willis (RIF’d teacher/Ballou SHS)

Voted No:  Camille Locke (teacher/Hart MS) , Erich Martel (teacher/Wilson SHS ), Lorraine Smith (teacher/Bancroft ES)

Voted Yes:  Willie Brewer (RIF'ed teacher/Marshall ES) , Agnes Dyson (RIF'ed teacher/Woodson SHS), Sheila Gill (RIF'ed counselor/McKinley TSHS) , Nathan Saunders (WTU Gen. V.P.), Diane Terrell (teacher/Stoddert ES).

Not Allowed To vote: Candi Peterson, WTU Board of Trustees

* According to Parliamentarian, John Tatum’s interpretation, WTU Board of Trustees are not allowed to vote even as ex-officio member’s of the WTU Executive Board. I have repeatedly challenged this interpretation to no avail.

Absent: Sallie Littlejohn Dorsey, Pablo Giron’, Jackie Hines (BOT), Milton Bruce Williams, Rashida Young

Retired or resigned: Derek Davis, Gloria Everette, Tenia Pritchard, Joshua Rascoe 

Given that there were five YES votes mostly from the laid off WTU Executive Board members to three NO votes, the motion passed. The WTU President agreed to notify our lawyer On December 16 that the motion passed and request that he prepare his legal appeal.

Posted by The Washington Teacher featuring Candi Peterson, blogger in residence

11 comments:

  1. WTU has some lame executive board members. These teachers love to sit on the fence and practice blind loyalty for chicken George Parker. I know Robert Willis from Ballou. He hated to put up a fight for anything and was a real suck up for Ballou administrators. His loyalty got him terminated. Tell me why can't the board meet with the WTU attorney ? Is he hiding out or what?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Do we know for sure that George Parker followed through with the union attorney? I don't trust him to do so without some kind of pressure. The WTU needs new blood!
    Also, how does one get in contact with this organized group of RIF'ed teachers?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Reply to Anonymous @ 4:44 pm

    I do not know if George Parker followed through on notifying the union attorney to date. However, board members are trying to get in contact with him about this.

    In order to get in touch with the RIF'ed teachers, you can feel free to email them c/o fight4fireddcp@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  4. The anonymous was right about Robert Willis. He is a nothing but a sucker and Mr. do nothing (zero) looking for favors.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for keeping us informed about WTU Executive Board meetings even when they get cancelled.I think it is important for teachers to come out and see how our union is being governed. I talked to a laid off teacher who attended and she was appalled at the way Parker conducted the meeting. I am not surprised especially when I look at how Parker runs rep assembly meetings. He lectures on and on for hours not letting the building reps speak until eventually everyone gets up and walks away.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I plan to attend the meeting with the WTU attorney. Please post the date for the next meeting. I plan to attend and will encourage others to be there as well.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Topic Change:

    Does the union have a count of how many teachers (especially teachers with 0 to 3 yrs.) resigned since August 09? The end date is Dec. 30, 2009. Do not include rif'd teachers.

    Does the union have a count of the number of veteran teachers retired as of October 5, 2009 (do not include Rif'd teachers)?

    Will the union be able to obtain a count for the number of teachers who will retire during/immediately after Winter break?

    Can the union request from HR this information monthly? Receiving a count does not violate personnel policy nor invade privacy.

    ReplyDelete
  8. once again thank you Candi for letting people know what is going on. As I stated in a earlier post anyone who still has faith in the Union is foolish, they need to go to these meetings and see what is really going on.

    As for the questions about the retired teachers and teachers that have quit I think that would be a very interesting stat to see..ummm

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous @ 2:50

    All great questions. My understanding is that the union does not have this information. What is troubling for me to understand is that they are not trying to collect this type of data for reasons unclear to me.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Interesting post you got here. I'd like to read a bit more about this topic. Thanx for giving this information.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Nathan Saunders,AND SOME OTHER UNION ADVOCATES ARE TRUE ADVOCATES FOR TEACHERS. I AM VERY DISAPPOINTED WITH SOME OF THOSE WHO HAVE DECIDED TO WORK FOR THE UNION AND NOT DO THEIR JOB. THE PEOPLE WHO WORK AT WTU KNOW THOSE THAT ARE TRULY DOING THEIR JOBS AND THE ONES THAT ARE NOT. IT IS TIME TO FILTER OUT THOSE WHO TRULY DO NOT HAVE A VESTED INTEREST IN THE MISSION OR PURPOSE OF HELPING, AND KEEP THOSE WHO DO HAVE A VESTED INTEREST IN HELPING. THINGS NEED TO CHANGE. IF YOU ARE AN ADVOCATE, YOU ALREADY KNOW THAT YOU HAVE TO FIGHT WHICH MEANS TO STAND, AND SOMETIMES YOU MAY HAVE TO STAND ALONE. WHAT IS WRONG WITH STANDING ALONE, IF YOU KNOW THAT IT IS FOR A MEANINGFUL PURPOSE? GET RID OF THOSE AT WTU WHO REALLY DON'T CARE, AND KEEP THE ONES WHO DO CARE!
    ANONYMOUS AND SERIOUSLY FUSTRATED WITH THOSE WHO ARE GETTING PAID TO NOT BRING ABOUT CHANGE.

    ReplyDelete